Friday, May 26, 2017

One of Survivor's biggest mysteries FINALLY revealed... Sort of...

Ever since Survivor began allowing three finalist to become eligible for the grand prize way back in season 13, one question has been weighing heavily on the minds of survivor fans everywhere. That being, what happens in the case of tie?  This is not possible with a final two and an odd numbered jury, but with a final three it is a very real possibility weather the jury is odd or even numbered.  I have often wondered how they would solve this dilemma and even Jenna Morasca pondered it during the first final three season when she was co-hosting Survivor Live.  This week during the reunion one of the most shocking survivor moments happened when Jeff Probst finally revealed the official rule, which is, the person who is not in the tie will go to the jury and cast the tie breaking vote.

As I said, I have put a lot of thought into possible solutions and I actually considered this possibility, but after careful consideration I dismissed this possibility because of one huge flaw, which still leaves a big question about this procedure.  The flaw and question is WHEN would the new jury member cast his vote?  You see the problem?  Jeff does not read the votes for months after they are cast and after the entire season has aired.  Would it be fair to allow a jury member to vote months later at the reunion after seeing so much more information from watching the show on television, that other jury members were not afforded? 

I do know perfectly well that the votes are not actually sealed after the final tribal without Jeff and the rest of producers tallying them, but still… what exactly would the procedure be in revealing the tie and sending the finalist to the jury?  Would they break a long standing tradition and tell everyone we have decided to read the votes right now, or would they just tell everyone it’s a tie and we need to do a tie breaker without even reading the votes?  Jeff did not clarify this during the reunion.  However they do it, a tie will still really screw things up.  Unless they allow the tie breaker to happen live, which I believe would be really unfair, we would lose so much anticipation and tension that comes from the reading of the votes, which is a huge part of Survivor's appeal.  So. I’m actually still very curious to see this happen, and discover just exactly how they will handle it.